Corrine Brown Committee Assignments For Jeff

While much speculation over House leadership changes in the 115th Congress is focused on a contentious speaker’s election that may never materialize, a long series of intraparty leadership, committee and caucus races guarantee significant turnover in top House posts next year.   

Retirements, term limits and lawmakers departing for other jobs mean that at least 17 prominent roles, and likely more, will change hands. Elections to determine those new influencers are set to begin during the lame-duck session that opens the week after Election Day.

Up first are the party leadership elections. The House Republican Conference is scheduled to hold its closed-door elections for speaker (assuming the party keeps its majority), leader, whip, conference chair, vice chair, secretary and policy committee chair on Nov. 15. Winners only need to earn a simple majority of the votes cast. Most of the conference’s picks are guaranteed to be the leaders for the next Congress, but the speaker faces the additional hurdle of a floor vote in January that requires a majority of the entire House, or 218 ayes.

The Democratic Caucus will hold its leadership elections sometime during freshman orientation in November — either the week after the election or the week after Thanksgiving.

Here’s a look at the posts that are or could be contested:

Party Leadership

National Republican Congressional Committee Chair

This will probably be one of the more high-profile leadership races, with Reps. Steve Stivers of Ohio and Roger Williams of Texas competing to head the House Republicans’ campaign arm during a midterm cycle in which the GOP will be looking to make up for expected losses from the 2016 election. The winner will succeed Rep. Greg Walden of Oregon, who is seeking the chairmanship of the Energy and Commerce Committee, assuming Republicans keep control of the chamber.

Stivers believes the NRCC could add value by helping incumbents who face primary challenges. Roughly 200 of the 247 House Republicans worry more about primaries than general election contests that have been the NRCC’s focus, he said in an interview.

The NRCC would only provide assistance in primaries if polling shows a real contest (similar to the existing Patriot Program), and funds would only go to members who’ve paid their NRCC dues, Stivers said of his proposal. “It’s got a very, very warm reception,” he said. “People are very excited about and anxious about some help in primaries.”

A Williams spokesman said the congressman would not discuss the NRCC race until after the election, honoring a request from Speaker Paul D. Ryan for members to not publicly campaign for leadership races before then. His decision to run came after numerous members approached him to fill the role because of his fundraising experience, the spokesman said. Williams has run the Republican National Committee’s Eagles program, which provides access to donors who contribute $15,000 or more a year and has helped former President George W. Bush and Texas Sen. John Cornyn.

Republican Conference Vice Chair

Kansas Rep. Lynn Jenkins, the current conference vice chairwoman, has not said whether she will run again, but if she decides not to — as some are speculating — it will likely create a contested election. A Jenkins spokesman said she is focused on serving her constituents and retaining a strong House majority, and that “there will be plenty of time after the election for leadership races.”

Texas Rep. Bill Flores, who is term-limited as the Republican Study Committee chairman, is considering running for conference vice chairman, but he does not plan to make any decisions until after the election.

Republican Conference Secretary

The conference secretary position will be open since North Carolina Rep. Virginia Foxx is expected to seek the gavel of the Education and the Workforce Committee. Indiana Rep. Jackie Walorski is considering running for the post. Other candidates may emerge to make this a contested race.

Democratic Caucus Chair

The current caucus vice chairman, Rep. Joseph Crowley of New York, has his eye on replacing Chairman Xavier Becerra of California, who is prohibited from seeking a third term under caucus rules. Crowley is not expected to be challenged but has not yet formally announced that he is running.

Democratic Caucus Vice Chair

The main contested race in the Democratic leadership will be for caucus vice chair. Reps. Barbara Lee and Linda T. Sánchez, two minority women from California, are vying for the position considered to be fifth in the leadership line.

Democrats are hoping this contest won't evolve into the kind of hard-fought battle the party faced two years ago, when New Jersey Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. and Rep. Anna G. Eshoo of California ran a heated campaign for ranking member of Energy and Commerce.

Members cast secret ballots in these races, so winners and losers don’t know who backed who.

Democratic Policy and Communications Committee Chair

New York Rep. Steve Israel is retiring, creating an opening for chairman of the Democratic policy and communications committee, a position elected by the caucus upon a nomination by the House Democratic leader. Other members are allowed to nominate someone if they submit a notice signed by five other members. Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi created the post for Israel in 2015 after he stepped down as chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Top Committee Posts

Most committee chairmen and ranking members are selected by Republican and Democratic steering committees and then approved by the larger party caucuses. The steering committees will meet separately in December.

The structure of the Republican Steering Committee may be tweaked in a Nov. 16 vote on GOP conference rules for the 115th Congress. Committee members will be selected after the rules package is adopted, but the panel is likely to be comprised of party and committee leaders, regional and class representatives, and perhaps, a few at-large members.

The Democratic Steering and Policy Committee is likely to keep most of its current membership, but there will be at least one opening as defeated Maryland Senate candidate Rep. Donna Edwards leaves Congress.

Energy and Commerce

Chairman Fred Upton of Michigan is term-limited and not seeking a waiver to continue heading the panel, even though he will continue to serve in Congress. That has created a contest between Oregon’s Walden, Illinois Rep. John Shimkus and Texas Rep. Joe L. Barton, the committee’s former chairman.

It's likely to be the most watched committee contest given the widespread jurisdiction of the panel and the unpredictable nature of the race.

Barton, the most senior member of the three, chaired the committee from 2004 to 2007 and served as ranking member from 2007 to 2009. His spokesman confirmed that he was in the running to take back the gavel. Considered a chairman emeritus, Barton's previous service atop the committee would normally mean that he would need to seek a waiver to get past Republican term limits, but his spokesman said leadership has assured the 16-term congressman that he does not need a waiver to run.

Shimkus, in his 10th term, has seniority over Walden, a factor the Steering Committee usually weighs heavily. But Walden, who's in his ninth term, has an advantage as the sitting NRCC chairman, since he’s spent the last two years raising money for his colleagues to help get them re-elected.

Appropriations

Like Upton, Appropriations Chairman Harold Rogers is term-limited, not seeking a waiver and not retiring. The Kentucky Republican has said he would be interested in being chairman of the panel’s defense subcommittee next Congress. And there’s likely to be an opening, with New Jersey Republican Rodney Frelinghuysen, the current defense subcommittee chairman, seeking the full committee gavel.

Frelinghuysen is the most senior Republican appropriator next to Rogers, so he is favored even if another member were to challenge him. But a contest seems unlikely; Alabama Rep. Robert B. Aderholt, the only other member to have discussed running, appears to have backed off.  

Veterans’ Affairs

Expect contested races for both party leadership positions. Tennessee Rep. Phil Roe is running to succeed retiring Chairman Jeff Miller of Florida, Roe’s office confirmed. Committee Vice Chairman Gus Bilirakis of Florida, who is more senior than Roe, is said to be interested as well.

Rep. Doug Lamborn, the second-highest ranking Republican on the panel, is also running, his office confirmed.

The ranking member slot on the panel is also open since Florida Democratic Rep. Corrine Brown had to step aside after she was indicted. California’s Mark Takano has filled the role in an acting capacity and is seeking to make the role permanent. But Takano faces a challenge from Rep. Tim Walz of Minnesota, who has touted being the “highest-ranking enlisted soldier to serve in Congress.”

Education and the Workforce

Foxx of North Carolina is relinquishing her Republican conference secretary post to run for the chairmanship of the Education and the Workforce Committee, where the term-limited Chairman John Kline of Minnesota is retiring. She is not expected to have a challenger.  

Ethics

The speaker and minority leader nominate who leads the House Ethics Committee, whose members have the unpleasant task of sitting in judgment of their colleagues. Chairman Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania is stepping down due to term limits imposed by the panel’s guidelines. California’s Sánchez, the ranking member, is eligible to stay on for one more term but is unlikely to do so if she wins the Democratic caucus vice chairmanship.

House Administration

Chairwoman Candice S. Miller opted this year to run for local office in her native Michigan, creating an opening for a position informally considered to be mayor of Capitol Hill. The chair of this low-profile panel, which oversees everything from floor proceedings, security, payroll and office furnishings, is nominated by the speaker and confirmed by the entire conference.

Two potential successors have emerged. One is Rep. Gregg Harper of Mississippi, who is considered second-in-command on the panel. His office said the congressman has confidence the speaker will do what is in the best interest of the House. Illinois Rep. Rodney Davis, who is third in line, may be another potential candidate. But all his office would say is that Davis would be interested in continuing to work on the committee in any capacity he is asked to by the speaker.

Rules

As speaker, Ryan gets to select the chairman of the Rules Committee and the Republican conference will ratify his choice. It is possible Ryan will reappoint Texas Rep. Pete Sessions, who was selected in 2012 to head the panel by former Speaker John A. Boehner.

Sessions has been a loyal Ryan ally, but this would be Ryan’s first opportunity to choose a Rules Committee chairman, and he could decide to shake things up.

For now, Ryan’s team is not indicating a preference. “The speaker is focused on protecting our congressional majorities, and we’re not discussing chairmanships until after the election,” Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong said.

Budget

Since Rep. Chris Van Hollen is running for Senate in Maryland, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi will nominate the next ranking member on the Budget Committee, who will then be voted on by the entire caucus. She’s stayed mum on who she considers a favorite, but Rep. John Yarmuth of Kentucky has expressed interest to fellow members. The position is considered to be a leadership post, albeit one that is the lowest rung on the ladder.

Party Caucus Changes

Republican Study Committee

The larger of the two conservative caucuses in the House will hold its leadership elections on Nov. 17. Two candidates — Reps. Andy Harris of Maryland and Mark Walker of North Carolina — are vying for the chairmanship, which changes hands with each new Congress, per the RSC’s bylaws. Both men are current members of the group’s board of directors and say they are seeking to align conservatives so the right can exert even more influence in the Republican conference .

Harris, who is also a member of the more conservative House Freedom Caucus, is the recommended choice of the group’s prior chairmen, given that he’s served in Congress four years longer than Walker, who is a freshman. But Walker has also racked up several high-profile endorsements and doesn’t plan to go down without a fight.

Tuesday Group

The Tuesday Group, a caucus of centrist Republicans, does not have term limits for its leadership. Currently, the group is co-chaired by Pennsylvania’s Dent and Robert J. Dold and Adam Kinzinger, both of Illinois. Dent, who is the most public face of the leadership team, is expected to remain on as chairman. Dold and Kinzinger may run again too, if they’re re-elected to Congress. Dold is one of the most at-risk members this cycle, coming in fourth place on Roll Call’s most recent list of the top 10 most vulnerable House members. Kinzinger, however, is in a Safe Republican seat, according to The Rothenberg & Gonzales Political Report/Roll Call rating.

House Freedom Caucus

Whether the Freedom Caucus elects a new chairman for the first time since the group’s inception in 2015 depends entirely on current Chairman Jim Jordan. The Ohio Republican is not expected to face opposition if he were to seek another term. But Jordan may be more likely to step aside and let another Freedom Caucus founder take the helm. North Carolina GOP Rep. Mark Meadows has signaled he will run for chairman if Jordan does not. It’s unclear if any other members may consider challenging him.

Congressional Progressive Caucus

The Congressional Progressive Caucus will elect its co-chairmen as it customarily does before each new Congress. This panel does not have term limits. Current Co-Chairman Keith Ellison of Minnesota is running again, his office confirmed. But staff of fellow co-chairman, Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva, said it was not known if the Arizona congressman would seek another term. 

Congressional Black Caucus

The Congressional Black Caucus is also holding an election, though it’s keeping a tight lid on who might be interested in leading the group. The CBC holds leadership elections before each new Congress. The caucus did not respond to a request for comment on whether the current chairman, North Carolina Democrat G.K. Butterfield, can or will run again. 

Congressional Hispanic Caucus

The Congressional Hispanic Caucus elects new leaders each Congress, per its bylaws. This year, the group will hold leadership elections in November. Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, the current first vice chairwoman, is planning to seek the chairmanship. Other members of the leadership team are also expected to move up a rung on the ladder.  

New Democrat Coalition

This is one of the more crowded races this cycle, with all three current vice chairs running to replace Rep. Ron Kind of Wisconsin, who cannot seek another term under coalition bylaws that prevent chairs from serving for two consecutive Congresses. Reps. Gerald E. Connolly of Virginia, Jim Himes of Connecticut, and Jared Polis of Colorado are all in the running to replace him. The New Democrats will hold their election the week of Nov. 28.

Blue Dog Coalition

Each Congress, the Blue Dog Coalition elects leaders after candidates are selected by a three-member nominating committee. Current coalition co-chairmen, Jim Cooper of Tennessee, Jim Costa of California and Kurt Schrader of Oregon, will select the nominating committee members after the November election. Once the nominating commission proposes the candidates, coalition members will vote. Because the nominating committee has not yet been formed, it’s difficult to speculate on who the candidates will be.

This article has been updated to include Rep. Doug Lamborn to the list of candidates running for chairman of the Veterans Affairs Committee.

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.

Topics: 2016congressional-affairscongressional-operationsconservativesdemocratselectionseventsfundraisinggop-brandhouseleadershipmessagingnrccpoliticsrepublicansuncategorizedwashington-dcAdam KinzingerAlabamaAndy HarrisAnna G EshooAppropriationsArizonaBarbara LeeBill FloresBudgetcaliforniaCampaignsCandice S MillerCharlie DentChris Van HollencoloradoConnecticutconservativesCorrine BrownDCCCDefensedemocratsDonna EdwardsdonorsEducationElectionsEnergyEthicsExecutive BranchFloridaFrank Pallone JrFred UptonG.K. ButterfieldGreg WaldenGregg HarperHouseHouse DemocratsHouse leadershipHouse leadership electionsHouse RepublicansleadershipICNW

Below, an archive of prosecution arguments in the Corrine Brown trial.

For the most current coverage, please check out the master post linked here: Corrine Brown Trial Coverage.

Thurs. 5/4

Dummy donations, dubious deposits: Prosecution testimony concluded Thursday morning in the trial of Corrine Brown, continuing the theme of dummy donations and dubious cash deposits into Brown’s account.

The testimony illustrated motive (Brown’s cash flow problems) and opportunity (cronies willing to help move money into her account via various extra-legal mechanisms). The unclaimed cash income, coupled with exaggerated donations over years, was intended to reinforce the tax fraud counts in the 22-count indictment.

Doug Shackelford, GM of “New Destiny Christian Center,” testified to $1,346 in Brown donations, in total, between 2009 to 2014. None of those were in 2012.

This, despite Brown claiming to have donated $1,000 to NDCC in 2012.

Brown gave the church $50 in 2013, but claimed $2,500 on her taxes.

In 2014, Brown gave no money, yet deducted $2,500.

Brown’s defense: that a certain, undetermined amount of money could have been doled out during “altar call” donations, without an envelope or identifiable markings – constituting “anonymous giving.”

April Green, financial officer of Bethel Baptist Church (whose pastor is one of Brown’s closest allies), continued the trend, discussing claimed Brown donations from 2012-2014.

Brown donated $3,700 in 2012, but claimed $3,980 to the IRS.

In 2013, Brown gave $3,445, but claimed $6,100.

2014 saw Brown donate $4,378. She claimed $7,200.

The prosecution wrapped with IRS Special Agent Shawn Batsch, who specializes in money laundering cases, and currently runs the Tampa field office.

Batsch produced a record of cash deposits Brown made from 2009 to 2014. These totaled $141,905 over the six-year timeframe. The money was sourced back to Brown’s campaign account, One Door, and various businesses of Jacksonville cronies, including Von Alexander and Reggie Gaffney.

Not all monies could be sourced. Some of the deposits were very substantial, such as $7,000 cash drops early in Jan. 2009 and 2010.

As One Door started ramping up in late Aug. 2012, the money started rolling in bigtime. 2013 saw more than $31,000 in cold cash dropped into her account.

The $800 deposits – matching the daily withdrawal limit from the One Door bank account – began to accrue also.

Claimed charitable contributions from Corrine Brown: also a subject of inquiry for Batsch.

Brown had a cash-flow issue, Batsch asserted: three mortgages, a “shop til you drop” mentality, luxury travel, high-end shopping, and spa treatments so that her outer beauty would match her inner glow.

These totaled $144,941 in cash from 2008 to 2014, with another $50,000 in non-cash donations. The numbers did not match the reality. And none of these were declared as income.

In 2008, Brown claimed $23,505 originally in monetary donations, boosting the number by $3,000 during the audit – after retroactive “documentation” of gifts was provided by Corrine’s cronies.

In 2009, Brown claimed $26,125 of charitable deductions, a number boosted by apparently non-existent donations to non-profits, such as the Community Rehabilitation Center.

In 2010, Brown claimed $24,721 of deductions, including a “non-cash” contribution of $10,000 to CRC, and $9,500 of cash to EWC. Testimony Wednesday revealed that these donations never actually happened.

In 2011, $19,720 of cash was claimed – including $9,500 to EWC, which never happened. Also in question: a dummy non-cash donation to CRC.

Of $30,922 in 2012 donations, there was no evidence of a non-cash contribution to CRC, nor of a cash donation to One Door – which was depositing cash into her account.

In 2013, $27,655 was claimed. The dummy donations that year included $10,000 to CRC, exaggerated donations to Bethel Baptist, and $5,000 to One Door.

In 2014, $30,300 was claimed. Dummy donations: $6,000 to CRC, $7,000 to One Door.

In 2015, Brown claimed $45,000 of total contributions. Her taxes were over $23,000 in liability, but she scored a $3,309 refund based on her asserted generosity.

Batsch produced a series of letters from the CRC, intended to demonstrate Brown’s generosity to Gaffney’s outfit.

Those letters have been proven throughout this trial to be a comedy of errors and a cavalcade of willful misrepresentation. And at the close of the government’s case, they were brought out again.

Spotlighted: the claimed donation of $10,000 worth of “time” to CRC, which is – it turns out – not tax-deductible. After that was rejected by Brown’s accountant, a donation of money – also $10,000 – was mysteriously and retroactively documented.

Also spotlighted: copies of four draft letters, some with blanks indicating that Brown’s donation could have been whatever she wanted it to be.

However, with Gaffney signing many of those letters, those who pay close attention to Jacksonville politics never would have expected veracity.

At least one Gaffney signed letter appeared to be forged, the downward scrawl of his signature replaced by legible penmanship – a dead giveaway.

This testimony was intended to further buttress the prosecution case regarding the tax fraud counts, which is that a cash-starved Corrine Brown yet again attempted to ease her tax burden with exaggerated donation claims.

Motion to acquit fails: Thursday morning in the Corrine Brown trial was the calm before the storm, begun with motion hearings before the government called up its three remaining witnesses

Judge Corrigan said he wouldn’t rule on them until the government finished his case, but they were introduced at the top of the proceedings.

Brown’s attorney, James Smith, noted that his witness list would be truncated, though it would still include former Jacksonville Mayor John Delaney.

Smith motioned for acquittal on all counts – conspiracy, wire fraud, mail fraud, and tax fraud.

The reason? Smith asserts that the government did not present count by count evidence.

The conspiracy count, said Smith, asserts that Brown conspired with others to commit wire fraud and mail fraud, and that all parties knew the money wasn’t going to charity but for personal use, and the charity wasn’t legit.

The conspiracy claim, said Smith, was “undercut” by Ronnie Simmons testifying.

“The foundation of this charge,” Smith said, was that there was “no intent” to raise money for scholarships.

The charity, said Smith, intended to raise the money for scholarships – but failed.

“Three separate times, he was questioned about that. He was firm and unequivocal,” Smith said of Simmons.

Moving on to the substantive counts – fraud counts – Smith said the same arguments apply.

“The government’s star witness testified that it was always the intent … to raise money for scholarships,” Smith said.

Hence, the threshold of fraud is not satisfied, given the “intent” of the parties to raise money for scholarships.

Smith noted that Wiley, Simmons’ girlfriend, never had a “significant relationship” with Corrine Brown.

Regarding false financial disclosures filed by Brown, Smith says the government’s case is “circumstantial,” and that Simmons forged Brown’s signature on at least one form.

There was no evidence produced, said Smith, that Brown was aware of the false assertions on her disclosure forms – and no evidence of “criminal intent.”

Nor did she know her tax information was false, Smith said.

Smith said that “mens rea” – state of mind – is key to this case.

And that Brown didn’t know.

For the government, Michael Coolican asserted “extensive evidence” produced in the case proved otherwise.

“The evidence in this case is that the defendant profited” – tens of thousands of dollars – from the sham charity.

Likewise, “fraudulent omissions” abounded. And Brown directed Simmons to route money into her account, Coolican claimed.

“Year after year, these events were held, and scholarship money was raised … the defendant never asked about that … never asked to meet the scholarship winners … that establishes her intent,” Coolican said.

Brown, said the prosecutor, selected the events and participated in planning, taking a “substantial role” in those events.

Coolican also cited witness testimony asserting that “she founded this charity … her charity,” pointing to Brown’s role.

“The court knows this is a scheme to defraud. It’s her participation in the scheme, the fact that the money was being deposited into her account,” Coolican added, noting that money from One Door and other sources was “never disclosed.”

Coolican continued to press that Brown knew what was happening, including on the tax counts, with “fraudulent statements about her charitable contributions.”

Coolican promised more evidence to come on the shaky donations, before pointing out the consistent underreporting of income “from a variety of sources, not just One Door for Education.”

“This is the income that’s on paper … she simply didn’t report it.”

The motion was denied on most counts of the indictment; however, count 19 (“financial disclosure forms”) and count 21 (“obstructing and impeding IRS laws”) will be held in abeyance.

Acquittal is not likely on that, said Judge Corrigan.

Wednesday 5/3:

The student turns against the teacher: Wednesday began, for all practical purposes, with Brown’s former Chief of Staff Ronnie Simmons taking the stand.

Testimony: brutal. But also brutal: the cross-examination, which undercut Simmons’ credibility on issue after issue.

Simmons, a Brown loyalist for decades who has been depicted as a mastermind type in this case by the defense, has already pleaded out and his sentencing is contingent on cooperation being deemed valuable.

More than one person in Corrine Brown’s inner circle described her as “like a mother” to them.

But of all those people, the claim may ring truest for former Chief of Staff Ronnie Simmons.

Simmons once dated Brown’s daughter Shantrel, in college. The lovers’ ardor cooled; however, the mother saw potential in Simmons, and hired him on.

Brown, serving a district as spread out as could possibly be drawn, worked “27/6” … and Simmons handled the legwork and the logistics.

There were whispers, for years, about Corrine Brown’s approach to money. Political veterans tell the tales – chapter and verse. Though often off the record, as there was fear of retribution from the Corrine Machine.

Now, they are more than whispers over drinks and late-night phone calls: they are the subject of an epic fraud trial, and every last development is top of the fold or lead story on the newscast.

The prosecution got Simmons to cop a plea, cooperate, and pin the operation on Brown. The defense holds that Simmons masterminded the whole operation that is One Door, from grooming girlfriend Carla Wiley to let him control the charity onward to the use of donations to fund a political operation and luxurious lifestyles: of Corrine and Shantrel Brown … of Wiley … and of himself.

Culpability: that’s the crux of the case. And that’s why Simmons was the most anticipated testimony in this trial. Short of Brown herself.

In Simmons’ testimony, he told a story of Brown knowing and orchestrating money transfers into her account from her campaign account and other friendly sources, since 1993.

The campaign account, the political committee account, and ultimately One Door: all mechanisms to move money to Corrine Brown, Simmons affirmed.

Simmons would sign One Door checks in Wiley’s name, and Friends of Corrine Brown checks in the name of the treasurer.

Forgery is not his forte. But no one noticed.

A process was established. Brown would communicate her needs. And Simmons, like every other person in her circle, would supplicate to Queen Corrine.

“You just don’t tell her no.”

Third-party checks, handled by Simmons, were processed and given to Brown. And some One Door checks were collaborative – with handwriting from multiple parties, again speaking to an ongoing conspiracy – an expressway to Indictment City, a road with no exit ramps.

Simmons’ devastating testimony continues after morning recess. Expect a 12:30 update with more blockbuster details from Jacksonville’s biggest political trial in the post-Consolidation era.

___

Wearing a baggy gray suit, Simmons was walked in by his attorney, and then sworn in.

In a gravelly baritone, Simmons described his meeting Shantrel at the University of Florida, who introduced her to Corrine, who was on campus giving a speech.

Simmons worked for Corrine Brown in the State House for a short interval, before her Congressional run in 1992.

“I ran that campaign,” Simmons said. And he’d run all the other campaigns, he said, while serving as Brown’s Chief of Staff.

The job was tough: managing multiple district offices, and other “day to day” functions regarding the 18-22 staffers.

“It’s almost like a small company,” Simmons offered.

Simmons moved on to discuss staffers, including previous prosecution witness Carolyn Chatman, an “area director” in Jacksonville, and Von Alexander, who couldn’t tell Corrine no when it came to moving cash into her account from pass-throughs.

“I kept the pulse of the political realm pretty tight … contact with donors, high-profile people,” Simmons added.

“For most of the years, I was the campaign manager … running every two years is a big undertaking,” Simmons continued. “You had to keep your eyes and ears on the pulse of the community.”

Simmons would come in from DC three months ahead of a contested election to run the campaign op, he said. But he was helped by Brown, who “came home every weekend.”

“We’re extremely close. Have been for 30 years,” Simmons said.

Like a mother to him, he affirmed.

And, like a mother, “you didn’t really question her,” Simmons added.

Simmons couldn’t question Brown. But on Jan. 4 2016, the FBI questioned him about One Door.

“It was an a-ha moment,” Simmons said of his first meeting, where he covered up the scheme and lied to the feds.

Corrine and Shantrel talked on the phone with Wiley and Simmons that evening.

The subject: FBI visits. The belief: “we’re all going to be talked to by agents,” Simmons said.

Simmons pleaded guilty in February to two counts, with one involving his sister as a “fake employee.” As expected, Simmons affirmed he had no guarantees of a lenient sentence in exchange for cooperation, before moving into exhibits and discussion of the scheme.

Simmons affirmed that his habit was to take cash out of the One Door account and put it into Brown’s account in his town of residence, Laurel, MD.

Simmons also affirmed Carla Wiley’s account of discussing One Door for the first time on a boat ride in 2012. Brown needed a non-profit to sponsor Congressional Black Caucus events, Simmons said, “to make the party happen.”

And Wiley had that registered 501c3 non-profit, allowing him to “raise money outside the normal limits” of campaign contributions, which are capped at $2,700 per individual in federal races.

“I needed to secure a 501 to make it happen,” Simmons related. And Wiley was eager to let him use her organization.

His interest in Wiley’s organization?

“Primarily, because I’d be able to control it,” Simmons said.

One Door opened many doors: to receptions at D.C. hotels and other Brown events, which took $330,000 of One Door money to run over three years.

Simmons and Brown discussed One Door, and she was on board with the use of the organization for events, starting with a BBQ at a Charlotte speedway, coinciding with the 2012 Democratic National Convention.

Brown’s PAC dropped in $25,000 into One Door, and Simmons let her know when the check was received, and when it cleared the bank.

The pattern accelerated from there.

In Sept. 2012, Simmons began a series of $800 cash withdrawals from the One Door account.

“The $800 I withdrew … I gave that to the Congresswoman … in her Congressional office,” Simmons related.

That wasn’t always the case: as described above, Simmons often would deposit those $800 withdrawals into Brown’s Bank of America account.

Brown asked Simmons to do that, he said.

“The Congresswoman asked me to do that,” Simmons said.

The movement came quickly. In 2012, four withdrawals from One Door in September, and that set off a pattern of dozens of such withdrawals.

Wiley gave Simmons the One Door debit card and checks, so it was easy.

82 withdrawals, totaling $60,200, came from One Door with no corresponding deposit. Some went to Brown’s pocketbook. Some went to Simmons’ wallet – “a couple hundred dollars,” he said. But he would never take the money out without ceding Queen Corrine a cut.

Usually, the cash handover would be in the Congressional office.

“Most of the time, the Congresswoman asked me to do that … two-thirds of the time,” Simmons related.

And Simmons “didn’t want anybody to know,” he said.

Depositing checks, Simmons said, would be “too obvious,” necessitating the cash handover.

Simmons also had control of the campaign account checkbook, which gave him practice in signing other people’s names. And Brown, while she had the debit card for “Friends of Corrine Brown,” did not have the One Door debit.

Simmons, likewise, claimed not to have Brown’s debit card. His sole role regarding Brown’s account: to deposit cash in it, he claimed from the stand.

Simmons described a long pattern of cash transfers from Corrine’s cronies companies, such as Jacksonville City Councilman Reggie Gaffney’s Community Rehabilitation Center, LaPool Transportation, and the Clara White Mission.

However, Simmons knew nothing about these transactions as they happened … or until discovery in the current case, seven years after the pattern was established, he said.

Simmons went on to describe the Brown/Reggie Gaffney relationship as “extremely close … good friends, they’d go out to dinner together, hang out.”

Discussion moved to checks from the Friends of Corrine Brown account, which Simmons would forge signatures on – since 1993 – and give them to Brown.

All told, the case was illustrated even before morning recess. However, more blockbuster details are to come before lunch. Updates to this testimony will follow.

___

The second and final leg of Ronnie Simmons’ testimony wrapped before lunch, with the prosecution’s aim being to ensure that the argument for Corrine Brown’s guilt got served up for the jury to savor along with their lunch selections.

Testimony focused on invoices and the transmittal of One Door payments via FedEx, which variously would be routed to Brown’s office, Wiley’s office, or Simmons’ home address.

Also evident from testimony: as the One Door mechanism aged, it exhibited some credibility issues even with credulous donors.

Testimony focused on a 2015 check from Bright House Networks, whose Marva Johnson was a “big supporter” of Brown.

Simmons sent an email to Johnson, attempting to close the deal. He was successful. An invoice for $5,000 followed. And Simmons put the touch on Brown for an extra $5,000 for One Door, perhaps – he said – to cover cost overruns from a Brown event.

Simmons kept hitting up quality donors in 2015, like frequent giver Bob Picerne.

“Bob is a good friend of ours, Orlando-based business,” Simmons said.

The usual go-between – Picerne’s lobbyist, Don Miller – was unresponsive. And as Miller testified last week, the last donation solicited never happened.

The Lazzara Family Foundation, as testimony revealed last week, cut off One Door when it was learned that One Door was not a 501C3.

Simmons knew it wasn’t legit; he didn’t care.

While they sought a “creative way” to donate anyway, Simmons responded, dangling a meeting between Gasper Lazzara and Nancy Pelosi, urging LFF to route the $5,000, promised for a computer drive, to Reggie Gaffney’s CRC, which had nothing to do with computers.

“I knew it was a 501C3,” Simmons said. Brown urged LFF to “have the check made out to CRC.”

Pushback followed, with confusion over what CRC had to do with the computer drive.

In fact, said Simmons, there was no computer drive at the time. The pretext, the hustle again were illustrated.

Testimony moved to donations to One Door from Stephen Bittel, current chair of the Florida Democratic Party, about computers.

Simmons was not in the conversation between Brown and Bittel, which was typical.

But he had email exchanges with Bittel, including about the use of his private jet for what turned out to be a Brown supporters event at a Jaguars/Redskins game in Maryland.

The box, valued at $30,000, belonged to Carla Wiley’s former employer.

There was, generally, a process to follow when dealing with One Door issues.

“The way to contribute,” Simmons said, was always suggested in follow-up emails, which alluded to rainmaking conversations Brown would have with donors.

Money would be solicited for events like the fabled trip to China by Congressional District 5 students. Meanwhile, money would be spent on things like a political event for Shantrel Brown’s boyfriend, who was in a Washington DC City Council race, along with $330,000 for Brown political events, and hundreds of thousands of dollars for the co-conspirators.

Brown’s taxes – the subject of multiple counts – were also discussed in testimony.

Simmons related that he handwrote records of phony contributions to One Door.

“The Congresswoman asked me to,” he said of one $12,500 donation recorded at tax time, which never happened.

Simmons would also sign tax documents and financial disclosure statements for Brown.

“It’s an office procedure I do,” Simmons said, lapsing into present tense.

Again, the forgeries were imperfect. Again, the reporting was fudged. And as with so many details in this long con, none of it mattered.

While Brown and Simmons made it rain, there was a real drought when it came to One Door, however.

Three years past the 2012 date in which Simmons and Corrine Brown yoked themselves to One Door, there were no scholarships to show these and other donors to justify their requests. No social media proclaiming foundational accomplishments. No pictures of kids enjoying computers.

The hustle had become self-perpetuating, a machine in continuous motion, fueled by donors who wanted access and who didn’t mind that One Door wasn’t fulfilling its mission.

The Browns never advanced money for One Door expenses. It was left to Simmons to ask Wiley what the account balance was, and inquiries became urgent when Brown needed money – for events, for account deficits, or just for walking around.

The one taboo: a check being written directly to Brown from One Door.

“It was just too obvious,” Simmons said.

Paperwork was just a formality, for donors and illicit recipients of the charity both.

In the end, the One Door was to Brown’s dispensations. And the education would be delivered, ultimately, to the political class.

Cross-examination kicked off shortly before lunch recess.

Brown’s lawyer discussed potential leniency in sentencing for Simmons’ cooperation, attempting to impeach the credibility of his narrative.

“Telling the truth just isn’t enough,” the defense lawyer said. The threshold is “substantial assistance.”

Simmons was compelled to discuss pleading guilty to just two of the 18 counts of the indictment, including his “use of [his] sister” and her phony spot on the Congressional office payroll, which went back years.

Forced to re-read his plea deal to find out how many years that was, Simmons went quiet.

2007 was when Simmons sister got put on the payroll. And that gravy train wasn’t derailed until the end of 2016.

When asked if he was “doing that because [he] needed the money,” Simmons said no.

Brown’s attorney noted that in exchange for copping to that conspiracy, all but one other charge would be dropped.

Also discussed: Simmons knowing Reggie Gaffney.

Their families knew each other for decades, but Simmons and Gaffney only interfaced around campaign time, Simmons said.

This was salient because Simmons’ mother was named in the description of a $3,000 pass-through check from CRC Transportation.

Simmons hammered by Brown’s lawyer in cross-examination: Cross examination of Ronnie Simmons continued Wednesday afternoon, with Corrine Brown’s attorney, James Smith, pressing Brown’s former Chief of Staff on the veracity of his testimony.

Aggressive cross-examination seemed, from the back row of the courtroom, to be a successful gambit. And it had to be, given the stakes and the weightiness of Simmons’ testimony.

Smith moved the discussion to personal relationships, between Simmons and the Browns.

Simmons, who had worked on twenty campaigns on behalf of Brown, was asked about campaign finance rules, which he defined as “anything that furthered the interest of the campaign.”

Discussion of the campaign account and that of Brown’s PAC (“Florida Delivers Leadership”) ensued.

“The leadership PAC could not further her election; she could only endorse with it,” Simmons noted.

After considerable discussion of campaign finance, Smith finally got to a point, noting that Simmons made decisions to sign other people’s names on documents, such as checks and tax returns, as part of day to day operations.

This was intended to depict Simmons, in Smith’s phrasing, as a “human resources manager … because the Congresswoman needed to focus on her core duties.”

Among those duties: votes on the House floor and constituent work, asserted Brown’s lawyer.

With that in mind, Brown came to rely on Simmons, Smith asserted – and Simmons assented.

For events such as the Congressional Black Caucus events described above, the argument went that Simmons was also the point man for 24 years.

Before One Door became the mechanism, he handled a lot of the legwork – along with some others, such as Carolyn Chatman and other staffers.

From 1993 to 2012, Brown’s role was that of most pols – show up, smile, shake hands.

Inquiry pressed into Brown’s campaign accounts, with Simmons denying personal misuse of campaign funds during that period.

____

Cross-examination then moved into the One Door period.

Citing Simmons’ interest in “control” of One Door, Smith noted that he got exactly that – including forging signatures from Wiley to cut checks.

However, Simmons did not know Wiley was taking money from the One Door account; an ironic detail, given that Wiley didn’t know Simmons was grifting from the charity either.

Lavish trips that Simmons took Wiley on – funded from the One Door account, unbeknownst to Wiley, Simmons confirmed.

And, Smith added, unbeknownst to Brown.

Brown, unlike Wiley and Simmons, had no direct access to the One Door funds.

___

Simmons had some credit card debt in 2012, he said. And sometimes, he’d use money from his sister’s Congressional salary – a phony job – to pay those bills.

And there were times that he’d skim off the top of the money he gave to Brown, he admitted.

As well, there were times he’d send blank checks – “just one or two” – to Von Alexander, Brown’s close associate in Jacksonville. That money would, of course, find its way to Brown’s accounts and purse. But Simmons never knew what the money went for, he said.

Brown would, Simmons said, direct withdrawals.

“If she asked for $500, I might take out eight,” he said, holding onto $300.

Simmons was agnostic, he said, about the timing of donations to One Door.

Smith pointed to a 2015 email to Marva Johnson, mentioned previously in this account, regarding the CBC Gala.

Excerpted text: “In a jam. When will the check arrive?”

Other indications that Simmons was invested in outcomes: requests for checks to be sent to his home address.

Discussion moved to Brown’s travel and funding behind it. Generally, the money came out of the Congressional travel budget, he said.

One Door funds were used for travel of Wiley and Simmons … but not for Brown, Simmons said.

Taxes were next.

Simmons denied writing checks for Brown to the IRS, then amended his answer to “I don’t recall,” then agreed that he signed checks after all.

“I just don’t recall … I don’t recall her owing the IRS,” Simmons said.

Of course, she did have $2,057 of tax liability for 2012 – but Simmons didn’t “recall,” again.

Presented with the check, Simmons finally remembered he did everything but sign the paper.

Simmons was asked how he told Brown that One Door was not a 501C3; his answer was less than clear.

Simmons also couldn’t produce examples of when Brown represented One Door as anything more than an organization she was involved with, when asked by Brown’s lawyer.

When asked about the money he took out of One Door, Simmons framed some of that as reimbursement for event costs, money he felt entitled to. However, that wasn’t the case for every transaction.

Brown’s lawyer moved back to the first round of FBI questioning to Simmons regarding One Door, in which he said all money taken out was legitimate.

In the four-way conversation after that event, Brown’s sole advice – Simmons admitted – was to “hire an attorney.”

And so he did. While Simmons was still co-defendant with Brown, he told Brown’s lawyer – multiple times – that he didn’t steal money.

“You’re lying to my face,” Smith said Wednesday to Simmons.

Pressure from the authorities began to weigh on Simmons; the breaking point was a threat to indict Simmons’ sister.

“I’m afraid for my family,” Simmons said at one point to Smith and others

That fear drove the plea, Smith said.

And in that plea, a relationship spanning multiple eras was severed clean, like an extension cord by a Weed Wacker.

The inconsistencies – those above and more – were like pin pricks on a tarp. One or two would not be dispositive. Massed, they created a thousand points of light.

It was clear that a lot of the defense strategy Wednesday was predicated on throwing Simmons under the bus – as he did to Brown when he pleaded out in February.

The threshold of guilt, after all: beyond a reasonable doubt.

The redirect exposed that Simmons – and presumably everyone else – realized that no money was going into scholarships almost instantly.

The events, said Simmons, were “in the hole.”

Whatever else was the case, the events had to go on. Brown and the machine had an image to maintain.

That seemed to have spurred the unspoken agreement: the parties go on, the scholarships forever forestalled … with an operative, malingering fiction – rooted around saccharine appeals to millionaires and billionaires to “help” totemic underprivileged kids – serving as the driving mechanism.

As the final segment of the afternoon moved forward, Simmons’ responses in cross-examination were challenged, ironically enough, by the prosecution.

“I’ve been going through this for 15 months. I read every piece of discovery. I just thought it was the right thing to do, to tell the truth and get it over with,” Simmons related to the prosecution.

Simmons also had to discuss meeting with Smith and his investigator.

“I initially went into meetings thinking they were in both of our interests,” Simmons said, meaning him and Brown.

He soon realized, however, that wasn’t the case.

What was clear: perhaps for the first time in the case, Smith scored a victory – or at least a stalemate.

Nat Glover testifies: The final segment of the day covered questionable charitable donations from Corrine Brown to local non-profits.

The biggest name of the day – former Jacksonville Sheriff Nat Glover, current President of Edward Waters College since 2010 – took the stand.

At issue: donations Corrine Brown claimed to have made to EWC, a cash-strapped HBCU with under 1,000 students.

Glover, when asked about donations, noted that “significant donations, I usually see … you generally see the person that made the donation. You like to be in a person to make a personal thank you to that person.”

Not doing so, said Glover, would be “suicide for potential giving.”

For generous donations, a “personal note … a Nat Note” also helped to grease the wheels.

In any event, a letter from EWC would document the gift.

Glover, when asked if Corrine Brown had made the generous gifts she claimed, couldn’t recall.

Brown claimed a $9,500 donation in 2012. If that had happened, Glover would have given her a “long hug and probably talked about it publicly,” with a potential “media opportunity.”

The letter was signed not by Glover, but by another EWC executive.

Glover never saw the letter until it was shown to him this year. And he never saw the check from Brown, or found records speaking to that.

The letter troubled Glover, who seemed crestfallen – as if his own probity, and not that of Corrine Brown, was at issue.

Discussion moved to two July 7, 2010 letters signed by another EWC executive, claiming $12,000 and then $8,000 worth of furniture and accessories gifted – in both cases – to “allow our president to conduct official meetings … in a most befitting manner.”

Glover, when asked about the $20,000 claim for executive office suite furniture, “wasn’t aware of what value we’re attaching to them.”

But he didn’t believe the value was “out of line,” Glover said, and when discussing the letters with another executive, he said he “wouldn’t split hairs with the Congresswoman.”

After all, Brown historically was “very supportive” of EWC, a legislative “champion.”

The executive who signed those letters, Eurmon Hervey, followed Glover to the stand.

Hervey noted an internal policy of the president acknowledging gifts of over $1,000, to try to “build relationships.”

Regarding the two letters from July 7, 2010, Hervey affirmed signing them – violating that sacrosanct internal policy.

Compounding the issue: the furniture predated Hervey’s arrival at EWC in 2009, calling more question to the dubious donations.

Hervey mentioned that Brown felt her donation hadn’t been acknowledged. When asked about contemporaneous tax audit questions regarding Brown’s charitable giving, he hadn’t heard about it.

Hervey, like Glover, lacked “firsthand knowledge” of when the donations were made, but seemed comfortable giving Brown the “benefit of the doubt” in writing those letters.

Regarding the Oct. 2012 letter verifying the $9,500 donation, Hervey was given pause.

“I just remember having a lot of apprehension,” he related, regarding the third retroactive letter.

Hervey’s power of recall seemed less than reliable on specific details, putting him in good company with many other witnesses.

Perhaps he was just cautious.

The power of Brown, as a sitting Congresswoman, seemed to wow Hervey.

“It was very uncomfortable … it was not the way it was always done,” Hervey said, regarding the letters confirming retroactive, dubious donations.

Cross-examination compelled Hervey to admit that he wrote the letter, and he didn’t feel forced by Brown to do so.

As well, Brown’s attorney – James Smith – pushed a line that a group of nine donated dolls could have constituted the $9,500 donation value.

Yet another witness from EWC, one with more institutional memory, noted that the furniture was donated as far back as 1998, with a presidential desk, a credenza, and other items predating Brown’s spurious claim.

And a fourth EWC witness, Linda Foster, has been a secretary at the college since 2003.

She affirmed that the desk and other items were there when she was hired on.

___

Also represented as Wednesday wrapped: the Community Rehabilitation Center, a company whose CEO is Jacksonville City Councilman Reggie Gaffney.

Gaffney, once upon a time, was in Brown’s inner circle. And he paid a price in credibility.

“There were none,” Dawn Smith, the fiscal manager of CRC said, when asked about records of Brown’s donations from 2008 forward.

Brown supposedly donated $12,000 to CRC in 2008. The letter of thanks, signed by Gaffney in 2009, was a lie.

A letter from 2010, regarding a 2009 “donation” of $12,000, was also a lie.

That letter was also signed by Gaffney.

A 2014 letter, documenting a 2013 “donation” of $10,000 of “financial support, was also a lie, according to CRC financial records.

In 2014, Brown claimed to have given $6,500 to CRC.

That also did not happen, Dawn Smith said.

The CRC record system, Smith said, was “elementary … in a shambles … unsophisticated … a lot of manual record keeping” before she came in to her current role two years ago.

Cross-examination made the point that just because no record existed of the donation, it didn’t mean that no donation had happened.

If a tree falls in the woods, and there’s no one there to hear it, does it make a sound?

__

Ju’Coby Pittman, CEO of the Clara White Mission, closed out the afternoon.

The former Jacksonville City Council candidate, once a Corrine Brown “Quick Pick,” was asked about their donation process – which is verified by three people, with letters acknowledging donations going out.

Significant donations of over $1,000 especially interest Pittman, as they could be repeat donors.

Brown, whom Pittman has known for decades, claimed to have given $3,500.

While Brown has been an “advocate” of the non-profit, no record of donations existed from 2009 to 2014, Pittman affirmed.

Tuesday 5/2: 

The $75,000 Question: What does a scheme to defraud look like? For the answers, go to the experts.

They described a woman who counted on the re-routing of money, from One Door and other sources, relying on lackeys, cronies, and supplicants to move the money her way.

The government culminated a rousing day of forensic accounting on Tuesday afternoon, with FBI forensic accountant Kimberly Henderson describing her role in the investigation of the One Door finances – and defendant Corrine Brown.

Important to it all: Jacksonville City Councilman Reggie Gaffney, whose non-profit and associated companies looked, according to evidence, to serve as a petty cash drawer for Brown in times of particular need.

Another important point: Henderson said, regarding these transactions, that no evidence showed that Simmons was involved in these transactions involving Gaffney’s and other local businesses … undercutting the defense, which is posited on Simmons being a mastermind of the whole scheme.

Seven years of financial records, personal accounts, and so on, of Brown and the other parties in the case, were subject to the investigation by Henderson.

“It was accumulated over time,” Henderson said.

Henderson dug deep into Corrine Brown’s credit card statements as well as her bank accounts and credit reports – necessary to find out what accounts the former Congresswoman had.

Mortgages were also part of the inquiry, Henderson said, with payments on her three properties totaling $5,000 a month.

Henderson’s wide-ranging investigation included a deep dive into the finances of Community Rehabilitation Center, Jacksonville City Councilman Reggie Gaffney’s non-profit to which Brown claimed to have given tens of thousands of dollars of donations over the time period.

Also scrutinized: the for-profit “CRC Transportation,” co-located with the non-profit; “LaPool Training and Education,” a for-profit registered under the name of Stanley Twiggs; “Northwest Support Services,” helmed by Gaffney.

Records show that these firms offered easy pass-through mechanisms to move money into Brown’s personal account. Activity in these cases had an “uptick” in August and September, Henderson said, around the time of the annual Congressional Black Caucus legislative conference … a time when the Brown political machine held a lot of events, and had a lot of financial needs.

The One Door account, likewise, fluctuated over the years, with balances going from under $1,000 to five-figure sums and back down again. Big-dollar donations would push the balance up, then a slow bleeding of funds would bring it closer to zero. Then another donation would see the cycle repeat.

At times, the account would go into negative territory. This despite not issuing any scholarships.

The reason this happened? “Transactions that seemed to correlated and feed the cash deposited into” accounts of the Browns.

This cash came from “multiple entities,” Henderson affirmed.

“She deposited significant amounts of cash,” Henderson noted, and inquiry led her to the companies listed above, plus the Alexander Agency.

Myriad “correlative transactions” ensued – transactions within a two or three day period, and some were presented to show the pattern, which showed cronies writing checks to cash, and then – in some cases – deposits into Brown’s account just minutes later.

Deposits which ended up totaling tens of thousands of dollars.

One example: CRC wrote LaPool a $6,000 check in July 2010; once deposited into the LaPool account, a counter check for $5,100 was written. $4,900 of that was put into Brown’s account two hours later. Stanley Twiggs handled all that.

Another 2010 example: a $5,000 CRC check to LaPool, handled by Twiggs, was converted into two counter checks totaling $4,100 on Aug. 10. Then, as if reenacting the miracle of the fishes and loaves, $2,600 found its way into Brown’s account.

Later in Aug. 2010, Councilman Gaffney’s “Northwest Support Services” wrote LaPool a check for $3,000. Another counter check followed, then $1,700 was deposited into Corrine Brown’s account.

In Oct. 2011, a CRC Transportation check for $3,000, written to cash, set up a $2,700 burst of liquidity into the gaping maw of Brown’s Bank of America account. Just a week later, the dance was repeated with a $4,000 check – all of which went to Brown. It took mere minutes for the CRC Transportation check to be cashed then dumped into Brown’s coffers.

When asked if Simmons had anything to do with the transactions, the agent had a short answer: “No.”

In other words: it was all Corrine.

From 2013 to 2015, five similar pass-throughs were demonstrated using the Alexander Agency account. Recall that Von Alexander, in her devastating Monday testimony, said that she did “whatever the Congresswoman wanted” when it came to work requests.

Some of these transactions happened when the Alexander Agency had just a few hundred dollars in its account. Money would flow in, and then flow out, with a pattern as predictable as lunar tides.

In these cases, the source money would be the One Door account; in one instance, the money helped to pay Brown’s $2,057 tax bill, in a rare year when her self-assessed, largely uncorroborated generous charity didn’t obliterate her tax burden.

Checks from One Door with blank “Pay to the Order” lines were produced, given to the Alexander Agency, deposited, and then recycled into Brown’s bank account – such as an Aug. 2013 check for $3,055.16.

A $3,000 check from One Door for “children’s summer camps” was deposited into Shantrel Brown’s bank account … at the Beverly Hills Wilshire hotel, where mother and daughter were vacationing. $1,000 of that sum went to Queen Corrine. All of this happened lickety-split.

Henderson also touched on contributions from donors who fell for the pitch, such as Florida Board of Education head Marva Johnson, who looked to spread “philanthropic” money from Bright House Networks (annual budget for that: $600,000).

Her contribution, and those from others – John Picerne, Richard Lipsky, and other deep-pocketed dupes thirsty for access to a Congresswoman to serve their business interests – ended up being routed into One Door’s account, moved through pass-throughs, and into the Browns’ accounts. Tens of thousands of dollars, over and over again, with the pass-through as the filtration system.

Contributions to One Door would take the foundation’s bank account from a negative balance into five-figure territory. Simmons would generally take the money out, $800 a day from the ATM, and put it in Brown’s account. Other times, pass-throughs, such as those described above and Brown’s campaign account, were the move.

Surveillance video on occasion caught Corrine Brown making cash deposits, such as a 2014 counter visit to an Orlando bank, and a deposit into Brown’s Congressional credit union account after operative Siottis Jackson acted as a pass-through for a money transfer.

Carla Wiley, the One Door president and Ronnie Simmons’ love interest, also would take money out of the account named after her own mother, paying car bills and withdrawing cash.

Much of the defense has been predicated on plausible deniability – the idea that Brown was too old, too feeble, too technologically inept, and too much a creature of her staff to be an active agent in the scheme.

Those are narrative details, requiring a suspension of disbelief and an embrace of the Grandma Corrine mythology.

Devastating FBI testimony from the unlikely source of a forensic accountant, predicated on documenting interactions between Brown and those who belong to her inner circle, deflates that defense narrative.

Here are numbers.

Over $35,000 from One Door, over $11,000 from the Alexander Agency, $15,400 from CRC, and $2,000 from Friends of Corrine Brown contributed to $75,000 of personal enrichment for Corrine and Shantrel Brown from the scheme, Henderson said. The bulk of that went to Corrine, though Shantrel scored over $13,000 of the total sum.

Signed deposit slips? Enough of them from Queen Corrine that if you dropped them, it would be like a game of 52-Card Pickup. No matter how you rearranged them, however, there would be a pattern.

A collage of surveillance images – taken over years – showed Brown, over and over again, bellying up to the bank teller and turning her bank account’s frown upside down.

Brown, who checked her account balance the way her contemporaries might check sugar or blood pressure levels, had a history of checking balances multiple times in a day before that sweet cash coursed in.

An analysis of deposits versus expenditures showed that “more money left her accounts than non-cash amounts came in,” said Henderson, creating a “shortage” that would have forced her into significant overdraws.

In some months, non-cash deposits would exceed $15,000 – a number that exceeded her Congressional salary. Monthly expenditures, in some months, exceeded $25,000. And sometimes, her shortage of income would be as high as $10,000 in a given month.

Cash: the great equalizer. Over one three-month period, $24,000 of cash deposits flowed into Queen Corrine’s checking account. All of this to keep her solvent. This went on before the One Door scheme even took off.

But it accelerated after, such as in Aug. 2013, when $8,200 of One Door money kept her from an over $8,100 shortage. And in a month in 2014, where over $6,000 of One Door cash kept her afloat. And other months, besides.

It had to work like this. There was no other way. Time after time, she hazarded overdrafts.

Meanwhile, said the FBI forensic accountant, One Door never bought computers. Brown never gave money to One Door, CRC, or the Clara White Mission.

The prosecution case in one sentence: the charity wasn’t a 501C3; the charity was Corrine Brown. And Corrine delivered. To herself.

The cash dried up in January 2016, when the FBI started interviewing witnesses. From there, no more cash went in to Brown’s account.

Over 90 months, without the cash, Brown would have had an average cash shortage of $1,430 – based on a total $128,733 shortfall.

All told, $159,481 of cash deposits went into her account from Jan. 2009 to Jun. 2016. $70,000 came after the One Door account was opened, Henderson said.

While Henderson said it sometimes was “normal to have large amounts of cash deposited into your account,” the usual proximate causes weren’t found for the most part.

All of this sets up a closing day of prosecution witnesses, including Ronnie Simmons, Reggie Gaffney, and others who once were close to the Congresswoman … but never will be again.

___

Were Corrine Brown’s tax returns a sham? Late filings and questionable documentation were what Brown “delivered” to the IRS, year after year.

On Monday, the prosecution built its case that Brown underreported income from One Door for Education, while inflating charitable contributions.

Tuesday saw that case continue, with a deep dive into tax returns, featuring Brown’s former tax preparer, Dawn Wright, followed by testimony from Brown’s former “area director,” who helped handle Brown’s tax returns.

Wright spent much of Monday afternoon discussing anomalies in Brown’s returns from 2008 to 2011, such as an attempted $10,000 donation of “time” to the Community Rehabilitation Center by Brown, along with late-arriving letters demonstrating donations from the previous year.

Those documents were used to lower Brown’s tax liability, giving her access to tax refunds in some cases, and lower liabilities in others.

As with the charity itself, Brown needed that liquidity to keep her sprawling operation going. And she needed her network of cronies to accomplish the task.

Wright moved into 2012 through 2014’s tax returns, which completed the narrative arc set up the preceding day, including undocumented donations to cronies’ organizations.

2012, a year in which Brown reported $178,000 of income, included more anomalies, including a $12,000 donation to One Door for Education … an organization she had already begun receiving money by then.

Brown reported over $61,000 of itemized deductions that year, including $30,000 in cash and in-kind donations. Generous non-cash charitable contributions featured to CRC for the fifth straight year; $11,000 of these items, including a bedroom suite.

Brown’s refund, again, was boosted by this reportage. And again, Brown’s tax preparer had issues getting records of these donations in a timely way – suggesting a pattern, again, of reverse engineering the facts for a desired result.

In Oct. 2013, with Brown again filing six months after the Apr. 15 deadline due to yet another request for extension, Wright pressed Brown’s assistant for receipts and verification. Brown eventually provided numbers for donations to non-profits and churches, via phone, along with narrative accounts of her donations.

The $12K to One Door had been described in documents as in-kind as late as October, but shifted to cash in the final filing.

The year 2013 showed a similar pattern to previous years examined.

No income, again, was reported from One Door. Of the $62,122 in itemized deductions, some familiar names popped up for the alleged largesse, with $27,655 going to charity – entirely by cash or check.

CRC was reported with a $10,000 donation; One Door, $5,000.

Brown’s refund was close to $3,000 that year, one in which the taxes were again filed in October, not April.

And again, familiar process issues surfaced, with Wright frustrated in attempts to get a clear accounting of donations.

And again, supporting documents surfaced as late as Oct. 2014, including a letter dated Feb. 2014 verifying the $10,000 donation to CRC.

Brown claimed to give $6,100 to Bethel Baptist in 2013, New Destiny Christian Center $2,500, and $5,000 for One Door: no documentation was provided to the tax preparer.

The year 2014 followed the pattern: $175K of income from pension and Congress, with no money from One Door. Over $57,000 in itemized deductions, including $30,300 in monetary contributions, to familiar outfits.

Brown owed over $24,000, but got a $2,653 refund on the strength of her purported generosity, which included four-figure gives to Bethel Baptist, Clara White Mission, CRC, and One Door, which scored $7,000 from her, according to Brown’s accounting.

Late on Oct. 15, Brown’s team still scrambled to make the numbers come out right. For five of the biggest donations, no documentation was provided, the accountant asserted. But the items were included in the charitable donation.

“We relied on the taxpayer,” Wright said, to provide documentation.

“It was late in the year, and we were starting not to get documentation as the years progressed,” Wright said.

Cross-examination initially focused on the role of Simmons in communication with the tax preparation process, an attempt to deflect culpability onto Brown’s former chief of staff.

Brown was characterized as a difficult client by Wright, due to the time demands and elastic accounting of the Congresswoman’s returns.

That difficulty, defense questioning revealed, precluded a one-on-one conversation with Brown telling her to provide the necessary documentation for the undocumented donations.

It was left to Brown’s staff (Carolyn Chatman and Ronnie Simmons) to handle the process, for the most part, over the years – all the while, “trust” from the tax preparers offered cover for a snowballing problem.

Chatman, who retired after her stint in Brown’s office, was Brown’s “area director” – and part of those duties included communications with Wright on tax issues.

Chatman also worked for the IRS for three years, giving her insight into tax issues.

Chatman did, she said, “whatever was needed” for Brown, including personal errands … and helping with finances, including making bank runs for the Congresswoman, and paying bills with checks from Brown’s bank account.

Chatman wasn’t as privileged as Simmons, who had access to Brown’s accounts; however, she was trusted with delegated duties, including helping with tax returns.

At times, that was a struggle: Chatman labored to get the kind of information needed for tax returns, a struggle exacerbated by Brown’s tendency to file in October.

Charitable donations, as have already been demonstrated, were difficult. Supporting documents proved elusive, and Chatman often had to take Brown’s word for the donation levels.

Donations to CRC, as during Wright’s turn on the stand, were a focal point of Chatman’s testimony. Those included a donation of $10,000 worth of “time,” which CRC asserted provided a “ray of hope” to the rehab center’s clients.

Wright pushed back against that on the 2010 return. As noted above, a second CRC letter documenting $10,000 of tangible donations (“household goods”) was supplied in its stead, after Chatman told Brown of the issue.

That letter was signed by Jacksonville City Councilman Reggie Gaffney, a Brown asset through the time CRC underwent scrutiny for Medicaid overbilling earlier in the decade.

Four (4) versions of that letter from 2011 surfaced in Chatman’s records, a testament to the power of revision, as the donation moved from the frustratingly non-tangible to the, at least theoretically, tangible.

One version of Gaffney’s letter was unsigned. Chatman had no clue why she had it. The same held true  with another version, with a blank by the donated amount.

Chatman held draft versions of some returns, such as the amended 2011 1040X. Brown advised her to hold on to it, but not to send it.

Chatman also was asked about an undocumented 2011 donation of $9,900 to Edward Waters, for which documentation appeared two days after an email from the college.

Chatman also got grilled over a 2012 email she’d sent to other parties, including Ronnie Simmons, regarding tax filing details, as she addressed the salutation to herself … suggesting to the government that she’d been prodded by a third party to provide the information.

Regrettably, her memory was less than reliable on this and other points.

Communications between Chatman and Wright continued on these matters throughout the period, with discrepancies between the donation statements given out by the local Bethel Baptist Church and the numbers Brown sought to report.

Chatman also reached out to Simmons on discrepancies at least one, emailing him that data for a previous year was being used for another year’s tax filings’ charitable contributions.

Despite these issues, Chatman felt it was not her role to pose questions to Brown.

“If she asked me to do something, I’d do it,” Chatman said.

Chatman would get information from Brown in various ways, including verbal discussions. Some information, such as property taxes, required online verification.

Brown never emailed her the information; Chatman said “she didn’t really use the computer,” an important point given the defense of Brown is that she essentially was too old and out of step with technology to mastermind the One Door scheme.

Simmons would “sometimes” provide Chatman with information, she said on the witness stand.

However, Chatman’s lack of recall failed to flesh out the narrative Brown’s defense wanted, beyond Reaganesque “I don’t recall” type statements.

From there, former Revenue Agent Tracie Lane took the stand for the prosecution.

Lane worked for the IRS for 35 years, and she was tasked with a tax audit of the former Congresswoman’s 2008 return in 2010.

Lane met with Brown, her lawyer, and her tax agent in 2010.

“The issues were charitable contributions, business expenses,” Lane said regarding the audit.

Of the $23,505 in contributions, documentation was worthy of scrutiny, including the much-discussed letter from CRC, signed by Gaffney, verifying a $12,000 donation; a claimed $2,500 contribution to Bethel Baptist Church; and in-kind contributions of $12,000 of furniture to Edward Waters College, which didn’t match the $4,000 cash claimed on Schedule A.

The numbers added up to $26,505, over what was reported originally.

Lane took the documents at face value.

___

Clinton appointee dishes on $10K donation: What seemed novel last week in this trial is now commonplace, as the testimony of Eugene Ludwig revealed Wednesday.

Ludwig gave $10,000, via his family foundation, to Brown’s 2013 golf tournament.

As with previous donors, the donor (who was once President Bill Clinton’s comptroller) described a familiar pattern.

He was introduced to Brown in 2013, with Ludwig having an interest in federal help with affordable housing issues.

Brown and Ludwig talked at the National Democratic Club, setting up the One Door pitch from Brown, which then led to a letter promoting the event sent to Ludwig.

Despite being massively wealthy and a former high-level Presidential appointee, Ludwig couldn’t remember much about the conversation. But he needed Brown: he wanted to make inroads into Jacksonville, and she was a Sherpa … “somebody respected in the local community.”

As with so many of these deep-pocketed dupes, the need for access outweighed the need to vet.

“It was my understanding that the money was used for low-to-moderate income purposes … educational activities,” Ludwig said.

Monday 5/1: What did Corrine know? And when did she know it?

Corrine Brown’s tax preparer, Dawn Wright, took the stand Monday afternoon, and with multiple counts dealing with false tax returns, the testimony of Wright was especially salient.

A pattern was established of Brown not having paperwork supporting deductions, then mysteriously getting the paperwork retroactively.

Brown’s returns from 2008 to 2014 were of interest to prosecutors, who subpoenaed them.

Wright described the returns as “relatively straightforward,” with a W2 from the Congress and a 1099-R for her state of Florida pension being the sole reported income.

No other income was reported. However, deductions for charitable contributions were substantial. And documentation was scant.

Wright would take Brown’s word for contributions, she said. And Brown’s filings were pushed back until October – rather than April – as she requested extensions.

Prosecution spotlighted issues going back to 2008; specifically, with $74,188 in itemized deductions.

The return included $23,505 in claimed charitable contributions to the non-profits of various political allies, including Bethel Baptist Church and Community Rehabilitation Center, along with “EWC/Urban League/NAACP/FAMU” and “various churches.”

Some verification was provided of these donations, such as a letter verifying a $12,000 donation to CRC, signed by CRC Director Reggie Gaffney. Also included: a letter in 2010 purportedly verifying a 2008 donation to Edward Waters College, where $12,000 of furniture constituted an in-kind contribution.

The 2008 tax return had no such documentation of the $12,000 of furniture, however.

And this established a pattern of inconsistencies.

2009 saw $70,162 in itemized deductions and $26,000 in charitable contributions, in a year Brown had a refund over $5,000.

One specific donation got extra scrutiny: $8,000 to Edward Waters College, with an extra $20,000 added on.

Meanwhile, a lack of a receipt for a donation to CRC caused concern for the accountants, especially since it was October of 2010 and they were still working through the 2009 return.

A lack of receipt created exposure to liability, and the accountant opted to move forward. Then, mysteriously, a letter substantiating the $12,000 donation – signed by Gaffney – was produced. And then a letter was also produced, with another $8,000 “non-cash donation” to EWC – for more furniture for the President’s office … following up the $8,000 the year before.

The pattern was established.

The year 2010 saw $5,221 in cash and $10,000 of in-kind donations claimed on the return.

Clothing, furniture, and household items given to CRC constituted that $10,000; claim was that the retail value of this stuff was $35,000.

An amended filing added $9,500 (via a donation to EWC) to those donations, and that allowed for a $3,416 refund, up from just over $700.

A letter from CRC indicating appreciation for $10,000 worth of Brown’s “time” was marked by Wright as “not deductible.” Luckily, CRC produced a letter in Aug. 2011 – the same date as the donation of time letter – valuing donations at $10,000.

The year 2011 was just as messy. Suspiciously-timed, vague letters of gratitude for support again came forth from Bethel Baptist and CRC.

Initially, itemized deductions for 2011 totaling $29,609 were filed, including $9,900 of in-kind contributions to CRC, and $19,700 of cash to a lot of churches.

As with previous years, a lack of documentation concerned Wright. A letter from Edward Waters College thanked her for her 2011 contribution; that letter was dated October 2012.

CRC also thanked her, with another letter, for $9,900 in donations. That letter was dated January 2012.

______

“If she put her money out, she’d want her money back.”: Von Alexander, a former Brown consultant who handled many of the former Congresswoman’s logistical issues while she was in Congress, including seeing her “Alexander Agency” function, like One Door, as a pass-through for backdoor contributions, took the stand shortly before noon, wrapping mid-afternoon after a recess.

Alexander, who was a PR consultant starting in the 1970s, moved to Jacksonville around 1997. She did some political work for Brown, and by 2001 was officially on the payroll, doing work that crossed over into some of the work Alexander’s agency was doing.

Alexander’s interest: “the social issue work” Brown was doing, which spoke to her.

Brown and Alexander bonded, with Alexander working on special events; Alexander stopped working for Brown in Apr. 2016.

Alexander handled personal errands: laundry pick up, airport transport, help with her family.

“We were there, you know, in a sense at the pleasure of the Congresswoman. If she had things she needed to do, she would ask us.”

That included cash deposits into Brown’s account beginning in 2009 or 2010. There was no saying no to that kind of “directive,” Alexander said.

Money began to flow in 2012 from One Door, via a signed check for $4,000 from Carla Wiley, to the Alexander Agency. Some of the writing on the check was identified as that of Ronnie Simmons by Alexander.

“Ever since I’ve been working for them, since 2001, that was protocol,” Alexander said regarding Simmons signing checks.

Money passed from that check to the accounts of Corrine Brown and Shantrel Brown, along with $3,100 for cash. Alexander understood those funds to be for “reimbursement” for the “National Voter Registration Marketing Team.”

“The Congresswoman would quite often advance” funds for “last-minute” spends.

“If she put her money out,” Alexander said, “she’d want her money back.”

And this set up a pattern of pass throughs. But easily justified, as that was not the first, nor the last, time Alexander would render this service.

A $6,900 Congressional Black Caucus Institute check from Sept. 2012 payable to Alexander Agency saw $2,000 go for cash, $2,000 for One Door, and $1,000 for Brown’s bank account. Simmons, as with previous checks, filled out the “pay to the order of” line.

Meanwhile, deposit slips into Brown’s account were filled out in the Congresswoman’s familiar scrawl.

A $15,662 check to the Alexander Agency from the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America, written in 2013 at Brown’s behest, was likewise split many ways: $4,000 cash (via one check that Brown told Alexander to write); $1,395 of cash (for The Links, as “the Congresswoman needed cash to pay the Links”); One Door; and Brown’s checking account.

“She wasn’t using my money. She was using money that she said was reimbursements to her … for whatever she may have done for projects,” Alexander said.

When asked if she saw documentation, she said “very rarely.” No follow up was asked.

A May 2014 check from “Friends of Corrine Brown” was written to the Alexander Agency, with $1,000 of the $1,300 being routed into Shantrel Brown’s account.

That money was purportedly for a computer drive for local middle school students.

A check written to Alexander, a $3,055 deposit, was immediately turned around for One Door; the check was supposed to be for expenses related to the “Corrine Brown Invitational” golf tourney.

Brown said there were “other outstanding receipts” from the event. To that end, a $3,000 check was written to CASH, to facilitate reimbursement. Of that amount, $2,000 went into Brown’s Bank of America Account, Alexander noted.

An Aug. 2013 check for $2,086, sent from One Door to the agency, was signed by Simmons – yet Alexander contended that she sometimes got One Door checks from Brown herself: signed checks that were otherwise blank.

“She handed them to me most of the time,” Alexander said.

Alexander was “asked to put this [into her] account, and reimburse the Congresswoman for overages,” she said, at Brown’s behest.

Other checks illustrated the pattern: a $2,500 check, signed by Simmons standing in for Wiley, to the Alexander Agency was filled out by Alexander with the direction of Rep. Brown.

Brown asked Alexander to deposit it into Brown’s account.

Alexander wrote an $1,800 check to Cash, with a $900 deposit following into Corrine Brown’s account, and $900 to Shantrel Brown.

“Congresswoman Brown”: Alexander’s answer when asked why deposits were structured that way.

Then, months later, a $2,000 check, then a $1,700 check, handled the same way. Alexander followed Brown’s “instructions” regarding how the money was to be split between mother and daughter.

Similar pass-through functions were performed by Alexander with money from the “Friends of Corrine Brown” campaign account, where Ronnie Simmons also forged the signature of the authorized agent.

The money, according to “protocol … what I was told,” was “reimbursement,” said Alexander.

But Alexander didn’t see those records.

Alexander was cut a check from a New Jersey ambulatory surgery center; it was FedEx’d to her by Ronnie Simmons.

The owner of that center wanted a favor from Brown, and valued it $10,000 worth.

Alexander structured transactions, over a series of days, after the check came in; among the stated purposes, “canvassing” Jacksonville’s minority-access council districts ahead of the 2014 election. Among the more sub rosa purposes: money into the Browns’ accounts.

As with the other checks, Brown directed what was to be done with the money, Alexander said.

And it was done.

While there occasionally were overages in transactions, in which Alexander might get a couple hundred dollars, the picture drawn was one of a movie directed by Corrine Brown.

Pass-throughs – at least one – involved still another party: Siottis Jackson.

In Sept. 2015, Alexander wrote Jackson a check for $2,200; Jackson cashed it and deposited that money into Brown’s account.

The stated purpose: “the health care initiative,” an aborted Brown attempt to get a ballot measure on Medicaid expansion.

Alexander asked Jackson to help out, as she had an emergency that precluded, and Jackson ended up handling the transaction.

Alexander wrote the check from her own account. She never got paid back, she said. And she couldn’t afford the loan: over the preceding three years, Alexander made “$60-$70 thousand.”

Beyond the pass-through function, Alexander also did some work for One Door, such as coordinating the golf tournament. She couldn’t recall what she’d gotten paid.

Throughout the period, said Alexander, she was “not in a position to tell Corrine Brown no.”

“My directives came from the Congresswoman. I would call Ronnie Simmons to tell him what I did,” Alexander added.

“She told me the amount she needed to have. She told me what to put on the check,” Alexander said, adding that she even signed a check at Brown’s direction.

Cross-examination attempted to explore Alexander’s memory loss, a medical problem that she has.

Alexander rejected notions that her memory was “foggy,” as Brown’s lawyer attempted to undercut a longtime operative who locals dealt with for many years as point of contact for the Brown machine.

Siottis Jackson, meanwhile, took the stand to discuss his role in the enterprise.

In 2015, Jackson had worked on a city council campaign for an unsuccessful candidate, one backed by Brown, but Brown was “excited” by the work he did and hired him on.

Jackson became a driver and a political op for Brown directly. And, as seemed to happen, handling checks was one of the duties.

Jackson was written a $2,200 check from Alexander, and “Miss Congresswoman … needed to pay for an event.”

Jackson got that check from under Von Alexander’s mat and handled the transactions, going to Bank of America to make the transactions.

Simmons, said Jackson, had nothing to do with his section of transactions.

“I knew she was trying to get the job done in Washington,” Jackson said. “I do love her.”

Jackson’s own criminal history, including fraud, came into play in cross-examination.

__

One Door President calls charity a ‘fraud’:Carla Wiley, the head of the One Door for Education charity, took the stand Monday morning, in one of the most anticipated testimonies of the trial.

Wiley’s position was no mystery: she pleaded out already, and her sentencing is contingent on the usefulness of her cooperation.

What was a mystery – how Brown’s machine took over a previously below-the-radar charity.

Part of it came down to love. Part of it came down to circumstance.

And all of it, said Wiley, amounted to fraud.

Wiley, who dated Brown’s chief-of-staff and former co-defendant, Ronnie Simmons, outlined something key to the prosecution case: a narrative that Brown had a key role in orchestrating the scheme, even though emails and surveillance video show that Simmons did most of the withdrawals from One Door and transfers to Brown’s accounts, along with cash withdrawals.

Wiley’s charity and consulting business served as a pass-through for One Door donations, which went to lavish travel for herself and Simmons.

As the jury stared raptly at the witness stand, Wiley told the aspirational story of the charity’s founding, to honor her still-living mother, Amy Anderson, with a “scholarship fund” in 2011.

The name One Door for Education, said Wiley, was intended to connote “one door for opportunity.”

Wiley’s mother still lives with her.

When asked if she engaged in “fraud” for One Door, Wiley said yes – and that Brown and Simmons did also.

Brown and Simmons were the rainmakers, raising all but “two or three thousand dollars” of the $800,000 brought in, she said.

And, through all that time, she knew of one scholarship for One Door.

Hundreds of thousands of dollars came in, said Wiley, who owned up to wire fraud and profiting off of the charity.

Wiley wants a lighter sentence for her cooperation, she said, but was not promised anything.

Wiley discussed when the FBI came to her former place of business for a two-hour meeting with special agents. She admitted to lying “repeatedly” to the agents about taking money from One Door, and how much the charity had doled out.

Around the time of the FBI visit. Ronnie Simmons, Corrine and Shantrel Brown called her up, and the FBI was discussed.

“I had known they had visited Ronnie already,” Wiley related. “Shantrel had mentioned they visited her.”

One Door was not discussed on the call, but the subject matter was implied, and the quartet planned a dinner that never happened.

Wiley then decided to cooperate, recanting the earlier lies to the feds, and telling her truth.

Among the revelations: the original board of the charity, all locals from Northern Virginia, had no clue what was being done in its name.

The charity had closed its original bank account, with some thought of finding a different way of helping children, before on-again/off-again boyfriend Simmons convinced Wiley to let her non-profit host a reception for Brown in Sept. 2012.

Wiley offered the charity for that use. And she gave Simmons the debit cards and checks, trusting him to “manage it correctly.”

“I thought it would be a good way to help, get a lot of exposure,” Wiley said, with her access to her mother’s scholarship fund restricted to online only.

“As he would write checks, he would sign my name,” Wiley said regarding Simmons.

Wiley and Simmons would discuss the account balance, via email and text. Brown was out of the loop on these discussions, Wiley said.

Money, as documented previously, would flow into Brown’s account after donors were hooked — $800 per day, subject to ATM restrictions in her account.

Wiley stopped soliciting donations herself; the machine was run by Simmons within months after the arrangement was struck, even though donations would sometimes be FedEx’d to the office of Wiley’s former employer.

Money for car payments and other expenses, for Wiley and her family, coursed from the One Door account also, the witness said.

Wiley said nothing to Brown or Simmons, and didn’t know they were working the same scam.

After the 2013 golf tourney, Wiley realized that “there were a lot of fundraisers, but there weren’t any scholarships.”

She clammed up rather than make that point to Simmons, re: the $330,000 spend on One Door sponsored events in Brown’s honor.

At events like the Beyonce concert and the Brown cronies’ trip to a Jaguars/Redskins game, purportedly One Door events, Wiley said there was not even discussion of scholarships or One Door’s mission.

And Brown demonstrated no interest in what One Door was doing, Wiley said, never asking about scholarships.

Around the time of the Chinese “student exchange trip,” Simmons – egged on by Brown – pressured Wiley to expedite funds for the project.

Wiley, when asked to describe the Brown/Simmons dynamic, was that of “boss/employee … friends.”

“Privately, [he] might “complain” about Brown’s demands – but Simmons would always come through, Wiley said.

Wiley was powerless to control even political contributions made from the One Door account, such as a donation made to a love interest of Shantrel Brown’s, who was running for Washington DC City Council.

Cross-examination included a treatment of the “substantial assistance provision” that may impact Wiley’s sentencing.

As well, Brown’s lawyer said that One Door’s mission shifted from solely education to “other social justice activities,” which Wiley did not dispute.

With proceedings forced to recess by an untimely coughing fit from the defendant, Wiley’s cross-examination resumed that break.

The portrait was that of an essentially nominal charity, before Simmons took it over, without even board meetings.

Wiley wasn’t aware of much regarding the Corrine-related events the charity sponsored either, cross-examination revealed. She did know that money was being solicited, yet One Door scholarships were not being doled out at the events.

She “knew” One Door was raising money, but beyond that she was insulated from detail of some events, she said, though she did help with logistics for matters like a “senior citizen” bus trip to the 2013 Obama Inauguration.

“I [didn’t] hear about One Door, but I [was] President,” Wiley said regarding the disconnect.

She also knew Simmons was using his own credit card for events, seeking reimbursement from One Door.

Though Wiley eventually was given pause that One Door was branding certain events, this pause did not prove to be a deal breaker.

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *